On August 21st the License Appeals Tribunal (LAT) will be amending their rules to include important changes related document disclosure and the powers of the LAT for failure to comply.
August 23, 2023 01:12 PM
These changes are aimed to assist in facilitating early resolution by requiring the parties to exchange information, including information related to experts, well in advance of the hearing. The changes also aim to streamline the hearing process.
Note that the new Rule 16.4 limits the use of the adjournment request to a “one time only” consideration. This Rule prohibits any party from making an additional request for the same reasons. If another request is to be made, it must be with “new and exceptional circumstances” that could not have been known at the time of the original adjournment request.
Other significant considerations with the changes to the Rules relate to Case Conferences. The LAT now has the power to provide consequences to parties who do not file case conference summaries, including taking the non-compliance consideration into account when making decisions related to Rule 14.1 (orders to be made at case conferences) and orders related to motions for productions under Rule 9. The LAT is also expressly stating in Rule 20.5 that parties should exchange offers in advance of the Case Conference and to be prepared to discuss settlement at the Case Conference.
There are also specific rules related to representation and withdrawal of representation. Now if a representative wishes to discontinue representing a party, the representative must take steps to do at least 30 days in advance of an adjudicative event or receive an order from the LAT allowing them to remove themselves if it is within 30 days of the event.
These changes to the Rules provide practitioners clarification on the procedures before the LAT that have historically been unclear in the previous version of the Rules.
Old Rule: 3.2 Practice Direction
The Tribunal may issue public Practice Directions or similar types of documents to provide further information about the Tribunal’s practices or procedures.
The Tribunal may vary or waive the application of any Rule or procedure, on its own initiative or at the request of a party, except where to do so is prohibited by legislation.
The Tribunal may make such orders or give such directions in proceedings before it to control its process or to prevent abuse of its process.
The Tribunal may issue Practice Directions or similar types of documents to provide further information about the Tribunal's practices or procedures.
New Rule: 3.7 Requirement To Attend In-Person Or Electronic Hearing
A party as defined under Rule 2.16 and/or their representative as defined in Rule 2.20 must attend their in-person or electronic hearing before the Tribunal.
If an unforeseen event prevents a party from attending the start of the hearing, the party is responsible for contacting the Tribunal before the scheduled start time on the hearing notice. The party must advise the Tribunal of the nature of the unforeseen event that prevents a party from attending.
New Rule: 3.7.1 Party's Failure To Attend Start Of Hearing
In determining whether to proceed with the hearing in the absence of a non-attending party, the Tribunal will consider the reasons for the non-attendance, if any.
New Rule: 3.7.2 Party's Failure To Attend Hearing In Progress
New Rule: 3.7.3 Representative's Failure To Attend Hearing
New Rule: 3.8 Application Of Rule 3
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to all appeals effective August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 4.2 Notice Regarding Interpreter
Subject to Rule 20.6, if a party or a witness requires an interpreter in a language other than English or French in order to effectively participate in a proceeding, the party shall notify the Tribunal not less than 14 days before the hearing or case conference, and the Tribunal will either arrange for an interpreter at the expense of the party or approve the use of an interpreter of the party’s choosing.
New Rule: 4.2 Notice Regarding Interpreter
Same as old rule except now subject to Rule 20.7.
Old Rule: 6.7 Representation
A party may be self-represented or may have a representative.
Rule 6.7 has been removed and the rules for representation is now under Rule 24.
Old Rule: 8.1 Issuance Of Summons
The Tribunal may issue a summons on its own initiative or at the request of a party.
New Rule: 8.1 Issuing A Summons
The Tribunal will only issue a summons for witnesses, documents or things that are relevant to the issues in dispute and admissible at a hearing.
Old Rule: 8.2 Filing Of A Request For Summons
A person requesting a summons must file a Request for Summons with the Tribunal. The Request shall provide a brief explanation of the information the witness is expected to give at the hearing.
New Rule: 8.2 Filing For A Request For Summons
A request for summons must be filed with the Tribunal using the form provided on the Tribunal's website. The requesting party must demonstrate the relevance of the request to the issues in dispute.
Unless otherwise ordered by the Tribunal, the approved summons must be served on the person summoned no later than 10 days before the hearing. The requesting party must file their request in a timely manner so that the Tribunal can adjudicate and issue the summons in advance of the deadline for service.
The requesting party must serve a copy of the approved summons on the other parties when it is served on the person summoned.
New Rule: Rule 8.4 Application Of Rule 8
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any request for summons filed on or after August 21, 2023.
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule also applies to any summons issued by the Tribunal on its own initiative on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 9.1 Productions Of Documents - General
The Tribunal may at any stage in a proceeding, including prior to a case conference, order any party to provide such further particulars or disclosure as the Tribunal considers necessary for a full and satisfactory understanding of the issues in the proceeding.
New Rule: 9.1 Document Exchange, Production Orders, Witness Lists & Hearing Briefs – General
The parties shall exchange all documents, witness lists, and anything else they intend to rely on as evidence at the hearing.
The Tribunal may, at any stage in a proceeding, order any party to provide such further particulars, disclosure, and production of documents and things that the Tribunal considers relevant to the issues in dispute in the proceeding.
Old Rule: 9.2 Disclosure Of Documents
This rule has been removed and Rule 9.2 is now “Production Orders by the Tribunal”
Old Rule: 9.3 Tribunal Order For Disclosure
New Rule: 9.2 Production Orders By The Tribunal
Before requesting a production order from the Tribunal, a party must make reasonable efforts to obtain the document or thing without a production order.
9.2.1 Orders For Productions Between The Parties
Disclose or produce any document or thing the Tribunal considers relevant to the issues in dispute in the proceeding.The Tribunal will not make an order for the production of any document or thing that is not relevant to the issues in dispute in the proceeding, or that is unduly repetitious.
9.2.2 Orders for Non-Party Productions
A party seeking production from a non-party may request an order from the Tribunal by filing a notice of motion and serving it on the other parties and the non-party. The notice of motion must provide contact information for the non-party.
The Tribunal may order a non-party to disclose or produce any document or thing that the Tribunal considers relevant to the issues in dispute in the proceeding.
The requesting party must make reasonable efforts to obtain the document or thing without a production order.
Before an order is granted by the Tribunal, the non-party will have an opportunity to make submissions as set out in the notice of motion hearing.
Old Rule: 9.4 Failure To Comply With Disclosure Rules
If a party fails to comply with any Rules, directions or orders with respect to disclosure or inspection of documents or things, or list of witnesses, that party may not rely on the document or thing as evidence, or call the witnesses to give evidence, without the consent of the Tribunal.
New Rule: 9.3 Failure To Comply With The Rules
If a party fails to comply with any Rule, direction or order with respect to disclosure, exchange, production, or inspection of documents or things, that party may not rely on the document or thing as evidence without the permission of the Tribunal.
If a party fails to comply with any Rule, direction or order with respect to the exchange or production of witness lists, the party may not call a witness who is not included on a witness list filed in compliance with the Rules, direction or order to give evidence without the permission of the Tribunal.
New Rule: 9.4 Rules Specific To Aabs Matters
9.4.1 Document Exchange Between the Parties (AABS)
Documents and things exchanged between the parties pursuant to Rules 9.4.1 and 9.4.2 must not be filed with the Tribunal unless a party is ordered to do so.
Document Exchange Before the Case Conference
The requirement for document exchange between the parties begins as soon as the application is filed with the Tribunal.
Rule 20.4 provides that at least 10 days before a scheduled case conference, each party must file a case conference summary in such form as required by the Tribunal. The parties are required to verify in the case conference summary that the documents and things in the party's possession, which the party intends to rely on at the hearing, have been provided to the other parties.
At the case conference, the Tribunal may make orders for productions pursuant to Rule 14 and set deadlines for any document exchange that has not yet taken place between the parties.
9.4.2 Deadline for Document Exchange (AABS)
9.4.3 Filing With The Tribunal – 21 Day Deadline For Electronic And In-Person Hearings (AABS)
The parties should file a single, joint brief with the Tribunal whenever possible.
9.4.4 Failure To Comply With The 21 Day Deadline (AABS)
The Tribunal considers materials that are filed and served less than 21 days before an electronic or in-person hearing to be filed late.
In making this determination, the Tribunal may consider any relevant factor, including the factors set out in Rule 9.3.
Old Rule: 10.3 Expert Witnesses (Disclosure Timelines)
New Rule: 10.3 Disclosure And Filing Timelines
Old Rule: 10.4 Expert Witnesses—Challenges To Qualifications, Reports, Statements
A party intending to challenge an expert’s qualifications, report, or witness statement shall give notice, with reasons, for the challenge to the other parties as soon as possible and no later than 10 days before the hearing and must file a copy with the Tribunal.
New Rule: 10.4 Challenges To Qualifications, Reports, Statements
New Rule: 10.5 Application Of Rule 10
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any appeal commenced on or after August 21, 2023, and to any appeal commenced before August 21, 2023 for which the first notice of case conference is issued on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 14.2 Scope Of Case Conference Subject Matter
New Rule: 14.2 Scope Of The Case Conference Subject Matter
Old Rule: 14.6 Attendance And Authority Of Representatives At Case Conference To Settle Issues
New Rule: 14.6 Party Attendance At Case Conferences
A party as defined under Rule 2.16 must attend their case conference.
If an unforeseen event prevents a party from attending the case conference, the party is responsible for contacting the Tribunal before the scheduled start time on the notice of case conference. The party must advise the Tribunal of the nature of the unforeseen event that prevents the party from attending.
Old Rule: 15.1 Contents Of Motions
15.2 Service Of Notice Of Motion
A party may have a motion heard at a case conference or hearing, provided the party files the Notice of Motion and all supporting materials with the Tribunal at least 10 days in advance, or in accordance with any other schedule as may be determined by the Tribunal, and serves the Notice and supporting materials on all other parties.
15.3 Service Of Responding Party’s Motion Materials
A responding party shall serve any materials it intends to rely on in response to the motion to all parties and file them, with a Certificate of Service, with the Tribunal at least 5 days before the motion is to be considered.
New Rule: 15.1 Filing A Motion
all supporting submissions, which must not exceed 6 double-spaced pages in length, exclusive of evidence and authorities.
The moving party must serve the notice of motion and all supporting submissions on the other parties before filing with the Tribunal.
Motion hearings may be conducted electronically, in-person, or in writing. The Tribunal will determine the format of the motion hearing.
15.2 Motion Heard At A Scheduled Event
A party may request to have the motion heard at a scheduled adjudicative event.
The Tribunal may order a motion to be heard at a scheduled adjudicative event.
15.3 Responding And Reply Submissions
Before a motion is granted, the Tribunal may provide the responding parties with the opportunity to make submissions. The Tribunal may also provide the moving party with the opportunity to make reply submissions.
Parties must serve responding and reply submissions on the other parties before filing with the Tribunal.
15.4 Attendance At Motion Hearings
A representative may attend a motion hearing on behalf of a party. If attending on behalf of a party, the representative must have instructions on all issues being heard at the motion hearing.
15.5 Application Of Rule 15
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any motion filed with the Tribunal on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 16.1 Requests For Adjournments
New Rule: 16.1 Requests For Adjournments
A request for an adjournment of any adjudicative event at the Tribunal, including a case conference, motion hearing, settlement conference, or electronic, in-person, or written hearing must be made using the form for requesting an adjournment on the Tribunal's website.
Failure to provide a completed form and supporting submissions and evidence will result in the request not being considered by the Tribunal.
Old Rule: 16.2 Oral Requests For Adjournments
Despite Rule 16.1, a request for an adjournment may be made orally before a Member in exceptional circumstances with the consent of the Tribunal.
New Rule: 16.2 Oral Adjournment Requests
Despite Rule 16.1, a request for an adjournment may be made orally before a Member at the adjudicative event.
Oral requests will only be allowed in compelling circumstances where the party did not and could not have known of the circumstances giving rise to the adjournment request prior to the event.
The Tribunal may also direct that the request for an adjournment be heard at the event.
New Rule - 16.3 Factors To Consider
New Rule: 16.4 Adjournment Requests Following A Denial
Following the denial of an adjournment request, the Tribunal will not consider any further adjournment requests for the same event that are made for essentially the same reason(s) as the initial request. This prohibition applies to any party to the proceeding.
If there are new and exceptional circumstances, a party can submit a new form for requesting an adjournment with supporting submissions, as set out in Rule 16.1, for the same event.
When applying the "new and exceptional circumstances" standard, the Tribunal will consider "new" to mean that the information was not known, and could not have been known, at the time of the first request, and "exceptional" to mean something extraordinary or beyond the parties' control.
New Rule: 16.5 Application Of Rule 16
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any request for adjournment made orally or filed with the Tribunal on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 18.1 Request For Reconsideration
The determination of the request for reconsideration shall be heard by written submissions and may be heard by the same Member whose decision is the subject of the request.
New Rule: 18.1 Request For Reconsideration
The request for reconsideration will be heard by written submissions. It may be heard by the same member whose decision is the subject of the request, or by another member.
Old Rule: 18.4 Outcome Of Reconsideration
If the Tribunal orders a rehearing of the matter, the Tribunal may make any order that it could make following a case conference.
New Rule: 18.4 Outcome Of Reconsideration
If the Tribunal orders a rehearing of the matter, the Tribunal may issue procedural and administrative directions and any such further orders as the Tribunal deems necessary.
New Rule: 18.5 Review On Own Initiative
At the discretion of the Chair or delegate, the Tribunal may, on its own initiative, review any decision of the Tribunal. The Tribunal's review shall take place within a reasonable time after the decision or order is made.
When conducting a review on its own initiative, the Tribunal shall not make an order under Rule 18.4(b) unless it is satisfied that one or more of the criteria in Rule 18.2 are met. Before making such an order, the Tribunal will provide the parties with an opportunity to make submissions.
Old Rule: 18.5 Application Of Rule 18
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any request for reconsideration of a decision or order issued on or after February 7, 2019. Requests for reconsideration of decisions or orders issued before February 7, 2019 will be dealt with in accordance with the Rules existing at the time the decision or order was issued.
New Rule: 18.6 Application Of Rule 18
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any request for reconsideration of a decision or order issued on or after August 21, 2023, and any review on the Tribunal's own initiative of a decision or order issued on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 20.4 Aabs Case Conference Summary
Each party shall file an AABS Case Conference Summary, in such form as may be required by the Tribunal, with the Tribunal at least 10 days before a scheduled Case Conference.
New Rule: 20.4 AABS Case Conference Summary
At least 10 days before a case conference, each party must file a case conference summary in such form as required by the Tribunal. The case conference summary must also be served on the other parties.
An explanation of the necessity of calling more than two expert witnesses if a party seeks to call more than two such experts.
New Rule: 20.5 Settlement At Case Conferences
Parties should exchange settlement offers in advance of the case conference and be prepared to discuss settlement at the case conference.
Written offers for settlement must not be filed with the Tribunal.
Old Rule: 20.5 Combining AABS Claims
Now Under Rule 20.6
Old Rule: 20.6 Interpreter To Be Arranged At Tribunal’s Expense
Where a party gives notice pursuant to Rule 4.2 regarding the need for an interpreter, the Tribunal shall arrange for an interpreter at the Tribunal’s expense, despite Rule 4.2.
Now Under Rule 20.7
New Rule: 20.8 Application Of Rule 20
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to any appeal commenced on or after August 21, 2023, and to any appeal commenced before August 21, 2023 for which the first notice of case conference is issued on or after August 21, 2023.
Old Rule: 23.3 Disclosure Timelines For (Hta) Appeals
New Rule: 23.3 Disclosure Timelines For (Hta) Appeals
For clarity, the timelines in Rules 10.3 and 10.4 do not apply to HTA appeals.
New Rule: 23.4 Application
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to all appeals effective August 21, 2023.
These Rules Of Representation Do Not Exist Except In Rule 6.7 – See Rule 6.7 Above.
New Rule: Rule 24 Representation - General
This Rule applies to representatives as defined in Rule 2.20.
New Rule: 24.1 Party's Ability To Have A Representative
A party may be self-represented, or they may have a representative. In keeping with Rule 2.20, representatives are required to be authorized under the Law Society Act to represent a party in the proceeding and they must comply with the Law Society Act, applicable guidelines, and rules of professional conduct.
New Rule: 24.2 Declaration Of Representative Required
The Tribunal will not recognize a representative unless a completed form has been filed and served.
If a party wants to change their representative, the new representative must file a form for the declaration of a representative with the Tribunal and serve a copy on all other parties.
New Rule: 24.3 Proceeding Without A Representative
If, after having a representative, a party subsequently chooses to proceed without a representative, they must notify the Tribunal and the other parties in writing. No further steps are required.
New Rule: 24.4 Representative Withdrawal
New Rule: 24.5 Withdrawal Less Than 30 Days Before Next Adjudicative Event
The representative seeking to withdraw must also serve the form and notice of motion on the other parties. The representative is not required to serve the supporting material on the other parties.
The Tribunal will set the format for hearing the motion.
The Tribunal may hear the motion as a preliminary issue at the start of the next adjudicative event.
If the Tribunal orders an in-person or electronic hearing of the motion, the representative must attend the hearing of the motion.
New Rule: 24.6 Requirements Respecting Privileged, Prejudicial Information
A representative bringing a motion under Rule 24.5 who files materials with the Tribunal that are subject to privilege or that could, if disclosed to another person, be prejudicial to the client, must notify the Tribunal that the materials contain privileged and/or prejudicial information.
The Tribunal may make a confidentiality order for any privileged and/or prejudicial information relating to the request for withdrawal. The order may be made at the request of a party, the withdrawing representative, or on the Tribunal's own initiative.
The representative must redact or omit the privileged and/or prejudicial information from the notice of motion and from the materials served on a party other than the client pursuant to Rule 24.5.
The Tribunal will use the information contained in the motion and supporting materials solely for the purpose of adjudicating the request for withdrawal.
New Rule: 24.7 Outcome Of Tribunal Review
New Rule: 24.8 Requests For Adjournment Due To Withdrawal Of Representative
For clarity, Rule 16 and any related Practice Direction apply to requests for adjournment arising from the withdrawal of a representative
New Rule: 24.9 Application Of Rule 24
Despite Rule 1.4, this Rule applies to all appeals effective August 21, 2023.
2025 Best Lawyers Awards Announced: Honoring Outstanding Legal Professionals Across the U.S.
by Jennifer Verta
Introducing the 31st edition of The Best Lawyers in America and the fifth edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America.
Presenting The Best Lawyers in Australia™ 2025
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is proud to present The Best Lawyers in Australia for 2025, marking the 17th consecutive year of Best Lawyers awards in Australia.
Unveiling the 2025 Best Lawyers Awards Canada: Celebrating Legal Excellence
by Jennifer Verta
Presenting the 19th edition of The Best Lawyers in Canada and the 4th edition of Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in Canada.
Legal Distinction on Display: 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™
by Best Lawyers
The industry’s best lawyers and firms working in France are revealed in the newly released, comprehensive the 15th Edition of The Best Lawyers in France™.
Announcing the 13th Edition of Best Lawyers Rankings in the United Kingdom
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is proud to announce the newest edition of legal rankings in the United Kingdom, marking the 13th consecutive edition of awards in the country.
Announcing The Best Lawyers in New Zealand™ 2025 Awards
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers is announcing the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in New Zealand for 2025, including individual Best Lawyers and "Lawyer of the Year" awards.
Announcing The Best Lawyers in Japan™ 2025
by Best Lawyers
For a milestone 15th edition, Best Lawyers is proud to announce The Best Lawyers in Japan.
The Best Lawyers in Singapore™ 2025 Edition
by Best Lawyers
For 2025, Best Lawyers presents the most esteemed awards for lawyers and law firms in Singapore.
Announcing the 16th Edition of the Best Lawyers in Germany Rankings
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers announces the 16th edition of The Best Lawyers in Germany™, featuring a unique set of rankings that highlights Germany's top legal talent.
Celebrating Excellence in Law: 11th Edition of Best Lawyers in Italy™
by Best Lawyers
Best Lawyers announces the 11th edition of The Best Lawyers in Italy™, which features an elite list of awards showcasing Italy's current legal talent.
Presenting the 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers’ Compensation Legal Guide
by Best Lawyers
The 2024 Best Lawyers Employment and Workers' Compensation Legal Guide provides exclusive access to all Best Lawyers awards in related practice areas. Read below and explore the legal guide.
Combating Nuclear Verdicts: Empirically Supported Strategies to Deflate the Effects of Anchoring Bias
by Sloan L. Abernathy
Sometimes a verdict can be the difference between amicability and nuclear level developments. But what is anchoring bias and how can strategy combat this?
The Push and Pitfalls of New York’s Attempt to Expand Wrongful Death Recovery
by Elizabeth M. Midgley and V. Christopher Potenza
The New York State Legislature recently went about updating certain wrongful death provisions and how they can be carried out in the future. Here's the latest.
Things to Do Before a Car Accident Happens to You
by Ellie Shaffer
In a car accident, certain things are beyond the point of no return, while some are well within an individual's control. Here's how to stay legally prepared.
Find the Best Lawyers for Your Needs
by Jennifer Verta
Discover how Best Lawyers simplifies the attorney search process.
Attacked From All Sides: What Is Happening in the World of Restrictive Covenants?
by Christine Bestor Townsend
One employment lawyer explains how companies can navigate challenges of federal and state governmental scrutiny on restrictive covenant agreements.